BREAKING: Benghazi Lawsuit Just Blew WIDE OPEN… Clinton’s In Major PANIC MODE

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton


….But plaintiffs argue she shouldn’t get favors because she’s among ‘political elite’ because at this point it does make a difference!



Attorneys for three-time loser former aspiring president of the United States Hillary Clinton have asked a Washington D.C. federal court to dismiss a lawsuit over comments she made as secretary of state with regard to the Benghazi terror attack that left four Americans dead. Plaintiffs argue that the case should move forward to trial because Hillary does not deserve special treatment simply because she happens to be a member of the political elite. Plaintiffs were nearly awarded a default judgment against Hillary, however, Hillary was able to slip through because a judge brought forth arguments that Hillary was not properly served in this matter. Apparently, having your secret service agents refuse to accept service for you and refusing to allow a process server to serve you directly constitutes “improper service” according to this judge. According to what the process server documented when they tried to serve Hillary, her Secret Service delegation and campaign aides refused to accept the summons.

Hillary has now filed for immediate dismissal of the case based on the claim that plaintiffs, Patricia Smith, the mother of Sean Smith, and Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, did not properly claim injury in their initial complaint. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by lawyer Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA after the FBI determined Hillary was “extremely careless” in her mishandling and improper storage of classified information on a private server kept in her basement at her personal residence, all despite citing numerous laws that were broken by Hillary repeatedly. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that Hillary blatantly lied to them, telling them one story about the attack, telling another story to the media, and slandered family members of the deceased by calling

take our poll - story continues below

Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?

  • Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Image result for larry klayman lawsuit against hillary clinton


Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that Hillary blatantly lied to them, telling them one story about the attack, telling another story to the media, and slandered family members of the deceased by calling them liars. Klayman has filed a response to Hillary’s Motion for Dismissal stating that the allegations in the initial claims are plainly stated and correctly provide claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and “properly alleged” other damages.

Directly from the complaint Item #23 under Section V. Facts

During her campaign for President, Defendant Clinton has negligently, recklessly, and/or maliciously defamed Plaintiffs by either directly calling them liars, or by strongly implying that they are liars, in order to protect and enhance her public image and intimidate and emotionally harm and silence them to not speak up about the Benghazi attack on at least four separate occasions. These occasions include, but are not limited to:

(a) December 6, 2015 – Interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos – Defendant Clinton flat out falsely denied telling the families of Benghazi victims that the YouTube video caused the attack. After George Stephanopoulos asked Defendant Clinton, “Did you tell them it was about the film?”, Defendant Clinton responded, “No. You know, look I understand the continuing grief at the loss that parents experienced with the loss of these four brave Americans. And I did testify, as you know, for 11 hours. And I answered all of these questions. Now, I can’t — I can’t help it the people think there has to be something else there. I said very clearly there had been a terrorist group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um, between the time that, uh, I – you know, when I talked to my daughter, that was the latest information; we were, uh, giving it credibility. And then we learned the next day it wasn’t true. In fact, they retracted it. This was a fast-moving series of events in the fog of war and I think most Americans understand that.”

(b) December 30, 2015 – Conway Daily Sun Editorial Board Meeting – Defendant Clinton directly branded Plaintiffs as liars. After Conway Daily Sun columnist Tom McLaughlin pointed out discrepancies in Defendant Clinton’s private and public comments about the cause of the Benghazi Attack, and referenced Defendant Clinton’s interview with George Stephanopoulos where Defendant Clinton denies telling Plaintiffs that the Benghazi Attacks were caused by the YouTube video, McLaughlin asks, “Somebody is lying. Who is it?”. Clinton responds, “Not me, that’s all I can tell you.”

(c) March 9, 2016 – Democratic Presidential Debate – When asked about Plaintiff Smith’s allegation that Defendant Clinton lied to her by blaming the Benghazi Attack on the YouTube video, Defendant Clinton responded by saying, “I feel a great deal of sympathy for the families of the four brave Americans that we lost at Benghazi, and I certainly can’t even imagine the grief that she has for losing her son, but she’s wrong. She’s absolutely wrong.”

(d) July 31, 2016 – Interview with Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday – Defendant Clinton stated, “Chris, my heart goes out to both of them. Losing a child under any circumstances, especially in this case, two State Department employees, extraordinary men both of them, two CIA contractors gave their lives protecting our country, our values. I understand the grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that. As other members of families who lost loved ones have said, that’s not what they heard, I don’t hold any ill feeling for someone who in that moment may not fully recall everything that was or wasn’t said.”

Well, I don’t know about you but that looks pretty clear to me!

“Plaintiffs respectfully request that the court rule on defendant Clinton’s motion in a politically neutral fashion, as defendant Clinton, like everyone else before the court, is not above the law. To treat her differently than others would be treated would create and perpetuate a terrible precedent, as the American people have come to believe that, in effect, there are two systems of justice; one for the political elite establishment and one for the rest of the citizens of our nation,” according to the Klayman’s response to Hillary’s motion to the court.

The merits of this case are based on the claims by family members that when Hillary met with them at Joint Base Andrews, she gave them false information, telling them the Benghazi attack was “a result of an Internet video criticizing the prophet Mohammad” even though she knew the claims to be a complete fabrication. She then later changed her story, going on to “negligently, recklessly, and/or maliciously defamed plaintiffs by either directly calling them liars, or by strongly implying that they are liars, in order to protect and enhance her public image and intimidate and emotionally harm and silence them to not speak up about the Benghazi attack.”

The complaint also alleges that Hillary’s use of an unsecured email system against all protocol allowed her messages to be hacked and therefore compromised American operations in Benghazi. As a result, Plaintiffs are requesting to be allowed to conduct discovery and present all findings to a jury at trial. The suit, which targets Clinton in her private capacity, seeks unspecified damages.


Smith and Woods were killed in the Sept. 11, 2012, jihadist attack on the American compound in Benghazi. While Clinton and other Obama administration officials were publicly blaming the deaths on a response to an obscure YouTube video, internal communications show they knew immediately that it was a terrorist attack.

Klayman explains his reason for filing this case:

Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we also now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs’ sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist attack that took their lives. It is no coincidence that covert State Department/CIA operations were being run out of Benghazi. To add insult to deadly injury, Hillary Clinton told the plaintiffs that their sons were killed as the result of a video mocking the Islamic prophet Mohammed when she knew that they were murdered by Muslim terrorists. When the families exposed her lies, she called them liars to protect her reputation and to further her own presidential ambitions. She thus defamed the parents of fallen heroes Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith, and committed other wrongful acts, as alleged in the complaint.”

The lawsuit makes note of the facts that the FBI found Hillary, “at a minimum, was ‘extremely careless’ in handling confidential and classified government information and ‘there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information.’”

h/t – WND



 Please share this on all Social Media!


Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn’t like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn’t want you to see!

Disqus Comments