BREAKING: Bernie Sanders Was RIGHT The Whole Time And He Is PISSED!

Like this article?

Sassy Liberty AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS 

class action lawsuit was filed against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and former Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz in June 2016.  The basis of the lawsuit had to do with violating the DNC Charter and rigging the Democratic presidential primaries against Bernie Sanders.

Filed by Bernie Sanders supporters, the lawsuit was an attempt to force the DNC to admit their wrongdoing and to provide restitution to Sanders supporters who supported him financially with millions of dollars in campaign contributions.

Those contributions were funneled into Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid against the will of those that donated those funds.  The move even forced former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid to admit – ““I knew—everybody knew—that this was not a fair deal.” Reid claims Wasserman Schultz should have resigned much sooner than she actually did.

Related image

In a stunning turn of events, Ronald Reagan appointee, US Federal Judge William Zloch dismissed the lawsuit on August 25, 2017, after several months of active litigation. Attorneys for the DNC argued throughout the case that it would be well within their rights to rig primaries and select their own candidate if they felt that is what was necessary.
According to the Order of Dismissal –

 “In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent.”

The Mainstream Media could not wait to jump on the headline and trumpet the news to anyone that would listen.   The Washington COM-Post led the charge blasting “Florida Judge Dismisses Fraud Lawsuit Against DNC,” as a headline in their August 25, 2017, edition.
Image result for dnc rigs primaries washington post

The COM-Post states –

“To the extent Plaintiffs wish to air their general grievances with the DNC or its candidate selection process, their redress is through the ballot box, the DNC’s internal workings, or their right of free speech — not through the judiciary,” Judge William Zloch, a Reagan appointee, wrote in his dismissal of the class-action lawsuit. “To the extent Plaintiffs have asserted specific causes of action grounded in specific factual allegations, it is this Court’s emphatic duty to measure Plaintiffs’ pleadings against existing legal standards. Having done so … the Court finds that the named Plaintiffs have not presented a case that is cognizable in federal court.”

Image result for Florida Judge Dismisses Fraud Lawsuit Against DNC

What the COM-Post failed to recognize is this –

The suit was filed in July 2016 by Jared and Elizabeth Beck, two Florida attorneys.  They claimed a massive cache of hacked (or leaked) emails showed that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz had bribed, greased palms, and essentially done whatever was necessary, however unethical it may have been in their efforts to ensure Hillary received the Democratic nomination, defeating Sen. Bernie Sanders by whatever means necessary.

Yet the judge specifically states flat out the DNC can — and did — rig its own nomination.

 

From the Judge’s order –

“In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true — that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent.

The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publicly proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.” 

Image result for Florida Judge Dismisses Fraud Lawsuit Against DNC

However, that did not affect the merits of the case or the basis on whether the two attorneys had any legal basis for a lawsuit.

“The Court must now decide whether Plaintiffs have suffered a concrete injury particularized to them, or one certainly impending, that is traceable to the DNC and its former chair’s conduct — the keys to entering federal court. The Court holds that they have not.”

Image result for Florida Judge Dismisses Fraud Lawsuit Against DNC

What the COM-Post touts as a win seems at best an embarrassing legal admission that, at least for the DNC, America participates in selections, not elections and that is perfectly legal and acceptable according to a federal judge. Perhaps the plaintiffs got exactly what they wanted in forcing this admission to be made a permanent part of the court record, show to all and sundry that the DNC, led by Wasserman Schultz, stacked the deck in favor of Hillary.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Nation In Distress!

Here’s How To Be Sure To Continue Seeing Our Content On Facebook

Copyright 2017 Americas Freedom Fighters/ AFF Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without expressed permission.

Like this article?

Facebook Comments

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×