BREAKING News Out Of D.C.- BIG Day On Tuesday

If D.C. becomes a State,  then shouldn’t the entire Federal Government have to move out of D.C.? It was set up as a Federal District for a reason.

Founded on July 16, 1790, Washington, DC is unique among American cities because it was established by the Constitution of the United States to serve as the nation’s capital.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

From Breitbart:

The House of Representatives will vote Tuesday on whether to make Washington, D.C., a State.

take our poll - story continues below

Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?

  • Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The House Oversight Committee, chaired by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), voted the bill, H.R. 51, out of committee by a vote of 25-19 to create D.C. statehood Wednesday.

The ultimate argument seems to be whether the 23rd Amendment guarantees the federal Capitol at least three electors in presidential elections, Rep. Any Biggs (R-AZ) suggested Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

D.C. was never meant to be a “state” and the founding fathers who created it, new that D.C. needed to be separate from states.

The founding fathers knew that if D.C. was ever to become a state, that would provide the government with unprecedented powers to control congress and states.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Time Magazine explains:

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the document reads, “The Congress shall have Power To …exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States.”

James Madison outlined the reasoning behind this provision in Federalist 43, calling the arrangement an “indispensable necessity.” He wrote, “The indispensable necessity of complete authority at the seat of government, carries its own evidence with it… Without it, not only the public authority might be insulted and its proceedings interrupted with impunity; but a dependence of the members of the general government on the State comprehending the seat of the government, for protection in the exercise of their duty, might bring on the national councils an imputation of awe or influence, equally dishonorable to the government and dissatisfactory to the other members of the Confederacy.”

In other words, the founders worried that if the capital were to be a state, the members of the government would be unduly beholden to it. Madison envisioned that voting members of a D.C. state would be able to ‘insult’ or ‘interrupt’ the proceedings of government to get their way, simply by virtue of physical proximity to the halls of power.

Allowing D.C. to become a state, would provide the federal government to have a firmer grasp over congress, more control and ultimately “We The People”.

If it passes, this would the democrats to get rid of the filibuster as allow them to have complete control over their power grab all in the name of “infrastructure”.  Ultimately leading to an authoritarian government that cannot be removed by a voting system.  It all boils down to complete control of power under Marxism and Communism.

Breitbart continues:

Biggs’ view is supported by legal scholars, who opposed D.C. statehood’s feasibility without a Constitutional amendment to the 23rd Amendment. The Office of Legal Counsel in 2007 believed it was unconstitutional, the Justice Department under former President Reagan and former President Carter stated the transformation was unconstitutional, and so did Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, when he sat on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Additionally, twenty-two state Attorneys General sent a letter Tuesday to President Joe Biden and Congress arguing Washington, D.C., cannot transition into a state via legislation, but only through the method of a Constitutional amendment.

Opposition to D.C. statehood is argued on three classical points:

  1. Our nation’s capital was always meant to be unique. The founders wanted it to be a federal district, existing beyond the confines or influence of any one state.
  2. H.R. 51 would require Congress to ignore the plain command of the 23rd Amendment.
  3. Even those who support D.C. statehood admit district residents enjoy special benefits due to where they live and would enjoy an outsize influence in Congress.

The legislation is among those radical proposals the Democrats introduced in Biden’s first 100 days include: packing the courts, amnesty, reparations, federalized elections, D.C. statehood, and banning the Electoral College.

It is damn near impossible to not believe that there is a deep state agenda going on that leads down the eradication of our Constitution and Amendments.

SCROLL DOWN TO LEAVE A COMMENT! INVITE YOUR FRIENDS AND MAKE SURE TO SUBSCRIBE! WE APPRECIATE YOU ALL PATRIOTS! WELCOME TO THE AFF FAMILY!

Check this out next!

BREAKING: HERE WE GO- Black Thug With Warrant Fatally Shot By Police- BLM Looting, Rioting, And Burning- Watch The Video For Yourself

Join us at SPREELY , WeGoGabCodiasMumblit, Vomvos and WorldAnon!

It’s time to enjoy social media again… without the filthy Communist censorship!

DINO PORRAZZO at AMERICAS FREEDOM FIGHTERS

God Bless.

When you share to your friends you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you, we appreciate it!

Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn’t like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn’t want you to see!


Disqus Comments