BREAKING: Federal Judge Just KILLED Major Obamacare Provision, Liberals TICKED


Since its inception Obamacare has faced numerous federal court challenges, but the latest is a devastating blow to Barack Obama’s signature legislation.

Aside from causing premiums to skyrocket for millions of Americans, forcing them to pay higher deductibles for lesser coverage, and otherwise destroying the health insurance industry, the disastrous law, passed in the middle of the night without bipartisan support, also forced religious folks to act against their deeply held beliefs. Many have been upset with such provisions, which are clearly unconstitutional, but once they were put in front of a federal judge that Obama didn’t appoint they were struck down.


The law mandates that abortion and transgender issues be covered by providers. Obviously such provisions wouldn’t sit too well with those who value life and believe that gender is determined by simply dropping your underwear and having a peek, so when a federal judge in Texas heard the challenge in his courtroom, he abruptly shot them down in yet another major blow to the legislation.

take our poll - story continues below

Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?

  • Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Life News has more:


Here’s another one which I hadn’t heard about. Apparently a regulation was promulgated that would have required abortion (and transgender issues) coverage as a means of preventing “sex discrimination.”

Now a judge has enjoined enforcement under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. From the Reuters story:


A federal judge in Texas on Saturday issued a court order barring enforcement of an Obama administration policy seeking to extend anti-discrimination protections under the Affordable Care Act to transgender health and abortion-related services.

The decision sides with Texas, seven other states and three Christian-affiliated healthcare groups challenging a rule that, according to the judge, defines sex bias to include “discrimination on the basis of gender identity and termination of pregnancy.”

Denying abortion coverage is sex discrimination? That kind of blatant term redefinitionism (if you will) is one of the Left’s favorite weapons in the culture war they never cease waging.

The YoungCons found this snippet from Jazz Shaw at Hot Air which perfectly explains why this isn’t simply a religious issue – it’s about biology and genetics, and whether or not we’re going to allow ideological fantasies to trump scientific evidence.

The originators of the suit are referencing religious freedom as part of the initial complaint, and while there’s certainly an element of that in play, the appeal of this decision should probably focus more on the science underlying it all. This is yet another example of the Obama administration seeking to bend the definition of “sex” (when it comes to questions of discrimination) to encompass a Social Justice Warrior concept of “gender” as something unique and wholly separate from biology. The mandate would punish health care providers who refused to administer transgender procedures – even to children – in cases where it might conflict not only with their religious beliefs, but run afoul of their professional opinions as to the beneficial nature of such treatments.

These are procedures which the government doesn’t even force their own military doctors to perform, nor must such procedures be covered under Medicare or Medicaid (even for adults) under current rules. Forcing doctors to perform them on children heightens the level of alarm over this mandate. And that’s what the courts really need to answer as far as I’m concerned. There is absolutely zero compelling evidence being offered that anyone has a physical malady which requires correction based on the fact that they “feel like” a different gender than the one defined by basic science.

This injunction is only a temporary measure and the appeals process will drag out for a while. But like so many other of these “transgender” questions, it’s one which the courts need to address once and for all. This should be done on a scientific basis, providing guidance for legislatures at all levels going forward. And liberals who like to declare themselves the “party of science” on other subjects should be made to answer these questions once and for all.

Indeed. The same people who mock conservatives for rejecting the unsettled science of climate change are rejecting the long-settled science of biology.

It makes no sense, and religious objections aside the government shouldn’t be in the business of dictating what “science” we should and shouldn’t accept as valid. Thankfully, in just 17 days we shouldn’t have to worry about it anymore since the radical ideologue posing as a leader will be permanently vacating the People’s House.

If you enjoyed this story, be sure to follow Sean Brown on Facebook, and check out his website,

Let us know what you think in the comments below!

God Bless America.


 Please share this on all Social Media!

Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn’t like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn’t want you to see!

Disqus Comments