BREAKING: GOP Just Made HUGE Move Against FBI Director Over Clinton Decision… Here’s What We Know

Like this article?

 

Dean James III% AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS –

As you know, FBI Director James Comey, in his statement announcing the non-indictment of the BENGHAZI BUTCHER admitted that she was corrupt as hell and totally incompetent as well as committed several criminal acts. Still, he caved most likely due to some sort of blackmail or threat.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Now the FBI Director will have to explain to House lawmakers his bombshell decision not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her handling of sensitive emails.

FOX reports that Comey, who took no questions after announcing his decision Tuesday, agreed to go before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee after several lawmakers sought an explanation. In saying he would not press the Justice Department to pursue an indictment against the likely Democrat nominee for president, Comey nonetheless laid out a strong case that she had violated laws regulating government employees’ safeguarding of sensitive emails.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

“The FBI’s recommendation is surprising and confusing,” Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said. “The fact pattern presented by Director Comey makes clear Secretary Clinton violated the law. Individuals who intentionally skirt the law must be held accountable. Congress and the American people have a right to understand the depth and breadth of the FBI’s investigation.”

Comey said 110 emails in 52 email chains discovered on Clinton’s unauthorized server were classified at the time they were sent or received, including some that were “top secret.” He also said that while the probe did not prove Clinton’s server was hacked, it may have been – and he pointedly noted that she used unsecure devices while visiting countries hostile to the U.S.

The hearing is unusual in the speed with which it was scheduled, just one day after Comey announced that, despite evidence of being “extremely careless,” Clinton should not face criminal charges for mishandling classified information.

In addition to Chaffetz, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., wrote the FBI director demanding to know how he justified his decision.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

“I find the timing and manner of your announcement uniquely troubling in light of last week’s secret meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton,” Goodlatte wrote.

Goodlatte and Johnson both noted that one of the statutes Clinton was suspected of violating does not require criminal intent. The law is written to impose an obligation on government employees to safeguard sensitive documents, and thus requires a finding of gross negiligence.

Unbelievable.

VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP AND TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Dean James III% AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS

 Please share this on Facebook and Twitter!

Like this article?

Facebook Comments