BREAKING: Senate Judiciary Committee Opens CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION Into Barack Hussein Obama


The left continues to run their mouths about so-called Russian hacking.  By using disgraced and fired former FBI Director James Comey to attack the Trump administration, the Democratic mouthpiece may have written the proverbial checks that their backsides cannot cash, as this now has now opened up a legal can of worms for the Obama administration.

Under oath, Comey revealed several damning incidents regarding the Obama administration and the political interference as well as what could be termed as the outright obstruction of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.


Now the Senate will launch an investigation against the former Obama administration for obstruction of justice.  The Senate Judiciary Committee announced it will hold hearings to “examine then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s involvement in the Clinton email server investigation.” I suppose turnabout is fair play?

take our poll - story continues below

Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?

  • Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

If the panel does indeed determine obstruction of justice took place, it could lead to a separate criminal investigation and the appointment of another separate special counsel just for this matter.


Image result for loretta lynch under investigation

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s actions REEK of obstruction of justice according to Comey’s testimony –

  • Ordered him to mislead the public about the criminal investigation of Clinton by calling it a “matter” rather than an investigation. (He complied with her wish, even though it made him feel “queasy.”)
  • Refused to recuse herself from the case after Comey confronted her about a secret June 2016 meeting she had with former President Bill Clinton — five days before his wife was scheduled to be interviewed by the FBI. (Hillary was cleared three days later.)

Many concerns were also raised INCLUDING amongst the left that Lynch privately assured the Hillary campaign that she had the FBI agents on lockdown and the investigation would not “go too far,” according to a message the FBI intercepted involving then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, according to reports from the New York Times.

Comey testified that he worried that his former boss had a “conflict of interest” in her oversight of Hillary’s email investigation.  He further testified that he potentially considered the possibility of calling for the appointment of special counsel to take over the case. He stated in hindsight that would have been the right move but instead, he simply shut down the probe letting Hillary off the hook just three weeks prior to the presidential election.

Rather than questioning? Comey simply went along to get along, not rocking the boat.

Questions that may come up at the Senate hearing –

  1. Who else was in the room during your meetings with Lynch?
  2. Did you take notes?
  3. Are there any additional memos?

Keep in mind any and all memos or notes could be subpoenaed, along with an NSA recording of Lynch’s chat with Bill Clinton which took place on board a government plane.

Lynch is certain to be called on to answer to Comey’s allegations under oath, as well as finally give an accounting for that super double top secret discussion between herself and Bill Clinton just prior to the Comey deciding no charges would be forthcoming against Hillary Clinton in the email investigation despite that being beyond the scope of his responsibilities to recommend.

How Lynch will testify under oath remains to be seen, yet as Bill Clinton has clearly seen, perjury can cost one their law license so it is nothing to play with.

Lynch will likely need to answer the following at minimum –

  1.  What did she and Bill Clinton discuss?
  2. Did the investigation come up?
  3. Why didn’t she recuse herself, despite admitting it looked bad?
  4. Did she promise the Hillary campaign a whitewash?

The left will have an extremely difficult time dismissing this investigation as any sort of partisan effort either since Sen. Dianne Feinstein is the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary panel. Sen. Feinstein is quoted as stating on the record that Lynch’s actions are suspicious and a legitimate avenue of inquiry. Those remarks should allow for bi-partisan effort to aggressively pursue an investigation into obstruction claims brought forth by Comey’s testimony and to refer any and all evidence for criminal prosecution.

Many speculate that Attorney General Jeff Sessions would also recuse himself from this probe, it is likely to end up in the hands of a special prosecutor, making it a nightmare scenario for Democrats.  The left has bet much on the 2018 midterms to shift Washington back in their favor, yet despite their obstruction, none of that seems to be working out for them. Comey’s testimony has actually given Republicans grounds to shift focus from the Russia probe back to Hillary – Lynch – Obama corruption.

Hey Liberals how’s that witch hunt working out for you?

Source- AFF 

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Nation In Distress!

Here’s How To Be Sure To Continue Seeing Our Content On Facebook

Copyright 2017 Americas Freedom Fighters/ AFF Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without expressed permission.

Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn’t like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn’t want you to see!

Disqus Comments