Warren Buffet and his role in Nevada


Warren Buffet is one of the world’s richest men. In 2007, he allied himself with a man who was relatively unknown outside of political circles. That man was Barack Obama and with the help of Buffet, became President. What sort of favors would be owed to that man by the Democrats?

Warren Buffet and NV Energy


Last year, Warren Buffet made a small purchase in Nevada. Here is the story of that purchase from the Nevada Policy Research Institute deputy director Geoffrey Lawrence.

take our poll - story continues below

Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?

  • Whom do you consider to be the most corrupt Democrat Politician?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

For many, it was exciting to hear that an investor of Warren Buffett’s stature would put billions into Nevada in order to acquire the state’s electric utility company.

The real story behind Buffett’s acquisition of NV Energy, however, centered on Senate Bill 123, a bill moving through the Nevada Legislature on its way to passage. That bill will substantially raise power rates while also resulting in untold millions in additional profits for the utility’s shareholders.

At the time the sale was announced, Senate Bill 123, dubbed NVision, had moved out of the state Senate, and the Assembly commerce committee was debating it. Sen. Kelvin Atkinson had sponsored the bill at the request of representatives of NV Energy and U.S. Sen. Harry Reid — who personally appeared in Carson City to push the measure.


NV Energy wanted the Legislature to order it to close its coal-fired power plants ahead of schedule and to replace the lost capacity with new natural-gas-fired power plants. But the utility also wanted to continue charging ratepayers for the shuttered coal plants until it received all of the remaining undepreciated balance on these plants, plus decommissioning costs, a guaranteed profit share and compensation for the stockpiles of coal the utility had purchased but no longer wished to use.

At the same time, ratepayers would be charged for the construction of the new, replacement power plants.

On net, there would be no increase in generating capacity. Rates, however, would increase. The plan made perfect sense for NV Energy shareholders, since their profits are determined as a set percentage of the utility’s costs. Hence, shareholders can realize greater earnings by operating less efficiently — particularly by building and switching to new power plants before they’re needed.

Colorado’s electric utility was able to shepherd a similar proposal through that state’s legislature in 2010. At the time, the utility estimated that the plan would cause electric rates to rise only 2 percent faster by 2020. However, economists now expect the mandate — which required Colorado’s utility to close 900 MW of coal-fired generation and replace it primarily with new natural gas — will cause electric rates there to rise at least 11 percent and as much as 50 percent.

Similarly, NV Energy testified that its proposed mandate — requiring the utility to close 800 MW of coal-fired generation — would only cause electric rates to rise 2.59 percent faster over a 10-year period. However, because natural-gas prices are both more volatile in the short term and are expected, by the U.S. Department of Energy, to rise more sharply over the long term, it’s highly likely that the real rate increase will look eerily similar to what’s expected in Colorado.

Nevada’s Public Utility Commission protested the plan on the grounds that it would impose unnecessary costs on electric ratepayers while also removing the plan’s entire implementation from the PUC’s regulatory oversight. Along with the state consumer advocate, the PUC testified vociferously against Senate Bill 123 during legislative hearings. One PUC spokesman went so far as to say “NV Energy’s rate-impact estimates aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on.”

At the same time, however, investors on Wall Street were keeping a close eye on the hearings and salivating over the profit potential that NV Energy could gain with the bill’s passage. They upgraded NV Energy’s stock with the expectation that Senate Bill 123 could become law.

Then, days before the Assembly commerce committee voted on the measure, Buffett announced his plans to acquire all of NV Energy’s shares. Reportedly, Buffett first engaged in talks with NV Energy’s directors around the time that the utility inserted its fuel-switch plan as a sweeping amendment to Senate Bill 123.

Buffett then began personally placing calls to key policymakers — including Gov. Brian Sandoval, Atkinson, and Senate Majority Leader Mo Denis — lobbying for the bill’s passage. At the same time, NV Energy lobbyists, led by Pete Ernault — longtime advisor to Sandoval — amped up the pressure on lawmakers to support the bill.

Within a week, the Legislature concluded with the Assembly passing the expensive new mandate Buffett sought. Eight days later, Sandoval would sign the measure into law, guaranteeing the “Wizard of Omaha” huge new profits — at the direct expense of Nevada ratepayers.

Hmm, so, the Democrats are getting huge donations from green energy, even illegally. Harry Reid owes a lot of people and has someone that owes him in charge of the Bureau of Land Management. Neil Kornze can stop new oil production in most of Nevada, while working to get renewable energy in place, which he has intimate knowledge with working on the Western Solar program. Someone has to buy it, so in comes Warren Buffet buying the statewide electric provider.





Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn’t like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn’t want you to see!

Disqus Comments