BOMBSHELL: World’s TOP Scientists Just OBLITERATED Michelle’s School Lunches… Obama’s FURIOUS

Like this article?

Dean James III% AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS –

Michelle Obama , the self proclaimed CZAR of health and nutrition, just got some devastating news about her new federally mandated Nutrition Facts label when a dozen scientists submitted a letter this week arguing that her label, which requires that food manufacturers list all added sugars in the food item, is NOT based on scientifically sound facts.

The label will also cost companies at least $640 million to update, and a net social cost of $1.4 billion.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to AFF updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Washington Free Beacon reports that a letter critical of the new label signed by a dozen scientists, including Roger Clemens, a member of the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, and Eric A. Decker, the head of the Department of Food Science at the University of Massachusetts, was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget. The scientists said the new label is “misleading,” and note that it was based on the 2015 Dietary Guidelines, whose committee did not include a single expert on sugars.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

“We are concerned that U.S. public health policy in this area may be progressing down a path that history suggests to be counterproductive,” the scientists wrote. “Specifically, the FDA’s proposed rule revising the Nutrition Facts Label with regard to an added sugars declaration and the establishment of a dietary reference value (DRV) of 10 percent lacks both the scientific rigor based on careful consideration or evidence-based reviews and a thorough appraisal of unintended consequences that will surely arise.”

“The FDA has stated its proposals are based on conclusions from the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2015 DGAC),” they said. “In addition to the widely controversial nature of its report, it is critical to note that this committee did not include a single member with a specific expertise in sugars (or any carbohydrate) metabolism. As nutrition scientists and health professionals, we feel this is of significant concern.”

Image Credit / bighairynews.com

Image Credit / bighairynews.com

So this is all a big waste of money at the expense of all of us taxpayers to make the Queen appear relevant, which she isn’t. She never will be.

Sure, she’s the first black transsexual first lady but that’s about it.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Unbelievable.

God Bless.

VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP AND TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Dean James III% AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter!

Like this article?

Facebook Comments